3105 is a non-heat-treatable aluminum-manganese alloy in the 3000 series, featuring moderate strength, excellent formability, weldability, and general corrosion resistance. It is primarily used in sheet applications such as wall panels and signage. In contrast, 5052 is a non-heat-treatable aluminum-magnesium-chromium alloy in the 5000 series, known for its higher strength, outstanding corrosion resistance in marine environments, good fatigue properties, and moderate formability, making it ideal for pressure vessels, fuel tanks, and marine components.
The differences between 3105 and 5052 aluminum alloys lie in their composition, mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and typical applications.
5052 has significantly higher strength, especially at elevated temperatures (e.g., H32, H38 tempers), and is therefore suitable for structural applications, while 3105 has moderate strength and is suitable for general-purpose use.
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Alloy Series and Classification
- 3105 alloy belongs to the 3000 series (manganese alloy, wrought, non-heat-treatable).
- 5052 alloy belongs to the 5000 series (magnesium alloy, wrought, non-heat-treatable).
- Main components are manganese (0.3–0.8%) and magnesium (0.2–0.8%).
- Contains trace amounts of silicon, iron, copper, and chromium.
- Belongs to the 3000 series (non-heat-treatable, work-hardenable).
- Main components are magnesium (2.2–2.8%) and chromium (0.15–0.35%).
- Contains small amounts of manganese and other elements.
- Belongs to the 5000 series (non-heat-treatable, work-hardenable).
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Comparison Summary Table
| Comparison Dimension | 3105 Aluminum (3xxx series) | 5052 Aluminum (5xxx series) |
| Core Advantages | Cost-effectiveness, ease of processing | High strength, corrosion resistance |
| Application Scenarios | Lightweight structures in general environments | High-load or corrosive environments |
| Typical Industries | Architectural decoration, packaging | Marine, automotive, chemical |
| Long-term Cost | Low initial cost | High cost-performance over lifecycle |
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Chemical Composition
| Alloy | Aluminum (Al) | Manganese (Mn) | Magnesium (Mg) | Chromium (Cr) | Other |
| 3105 | ≥ 99.0 % | 0.55 % | 0.50 % | – | trace Fe, Si |
| 5052 | Balance | ≤ 0.10 % | 2.2–2.8 % | 0.15–0.35 % | ≤ 0.1 % Cu, Fe, Si, Zn |
Comparison of 3105 and 5052 Aluminum Properties
| Property | 3105 Aluminum | 5052 Aluminum |
| Strength | Medium strength | High strength |
| Corrosion Resistance | Good, suitable for general atmospheric environments | Excellent, especially outstanding in marine or humid environments |
| Formability | Excellent, easy for stamping, bending, and other cold working | Good, but slightly less ductile than 3105 aluminum |
| Surface Treatment | Supports anodizing, painting, and other treatments | Suitable for various surface treatments, with better weldability |
| Electrical/Thermal Conductivity | Average | Good thermal conductivity, suitable for heat dissipation applications |
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Mechanical Properties
Tensile Strength and Yield Strength
3105 (H14 temper):
- Ultimate tensile strength: 160–205 MPa
- Yield strength: 145 MPa
5052 (H32 temper):
- Ultimate tensile strength: 228 MPa (33 ksi)
- Yield strength: 193 MPa (28 ksi)
| Property | 3105 Aluminum | 5052 Aluminum |
| Tensile Strength | 120–240 MPa | 190–320 MPa |
| Yield Strength | 46–220 MPa | 75–280 MPa |
| Brinell Hardness | 29–67 HB | 46–83 HB |
| Elongation at Break | 1.1–20% | 1.1–28% |
| Fatigue Strength | 39–95 MPa | 66–140 MPa |
Elongation
- 3105: Elongation ~7–20% (depending on temper and thickness)
- 5052: Elongation 7–27% (higher in soft O temper, lower in H38 temper)
Hardness and Fatigue Strength
- 3105: Brinell hardness ~45 HB (F temper)
- 5052: Brinell hardness ~50–70 HB; relatively high fatigue strength
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Processing Temper Classification
- 3105 Aluminum: Mainly supplied in O temper (annealed) and semi-hard tempers like H12/H14, emphasizing formability
- 5052 Aluminum: Available in a variety of tempers including O, H32 (most common), H34, etc., to meet different hardness requirements
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Corrosion Resistance and Weldability
3105 has good corrosion resistance in atmospheric environments and is well-suited for arc welding and gas shielded welding.
5052 has excellent corrosion resistance, especially against seawater and salt spray, making it an ideal choice for marine-grade applications; its weldability is rated "good" to "very good" for gas welding, arc welding, and resistance welding.
3105:
- Good corrosion resistance, ideal for outdoor applications (e.g., roofing, wall panels).
- Compared with 5052, inferior corrosion resistance in marine environments.
5052:
- Due to its higher magnesium and chromium content, it offers excellent resistance to saltwater and marine environments.
- Widely used in marine hardware, fuel tanks, and coastal structures.
Both alloys are weldable using TIG, MIG, or resistance welding methods.
Due to its higher magnesium content, 5052 is more prone to cracking during welding.
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Formability and Workability
3105 is praised for its excellent formability and can be cold-formed into complex shapes (bending radius for H12–H16 can be as low as 1–2 times the thickness).
5052 in annealed (O) condition is easy to form; cold working (H32–H38) increases strength but reduces ductility.
- 3105 has slightly better formability and is easier to bend and shape, commonly used for roofing or gutters.
- 5052 has moderate formability, but complex shapes may require annealing treatment.
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Thermal and Electrical Conductivity
| Property | 3105 Aluminum | 5052 Aluminum |
| Thermal Conductivity | 170 W/m-K | 140 W/m-K |
| Electrical Conductivity | 44% IACS | 35% IACS |
3105 is more suitable for thermal and electrical applications, such as heat management systems.
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Applications
- 3105 Aluminum: Residential siding, mobile homes, signage, gutters, and general sheet metal components. Suitable for applications requiring moderate strength and cost-effectiveness.
- 5052 Aluminum: Marine components (e.g., hulls, fuel tanks), aircraft parts, automotive panels, and high-stress structural applications. Ideal for environments requiring high corrosion resistance and durability.
| Aluminum Alloy Grade | Application Category | Specific Application Examples |
| 3105 | Building Materials | Residential and commercial siding and roofing panels |
| Signage and Decoration | Signs and decorative strips | |
| HVAC and Sheet Metal Processing | HVAC duct systems, general sheet metal | |
| 5052 | Marine Manufacturing | Marine components (hulls, decks, fuel tanks) |
| Pressure Equipment and Chemical Facilities | Pressure vessels, storage tanks, chemical equipment | |
| Electrical and Hardware Fittings | Street lights, electrical appliances, rivets, wires |
Application Field Differentiation
Typical Uses of 3105 Aluminum
- Architectural decoration (e.g., curtain walls, ceilings)
- Lightweight containers (e.g., food cans, packaging boxes)
- Household items (decorative parts, simple structural components)
Typical Uses of 5052 Aluminum
- Shipbuilding (hull shells, decks)
- Automotive parts (car doors, fuel tanks)
- Electronics and appliances (radiators, casings)
- Chemical equipment (corrosion-resistant piping)
3105 Aluminum vs 5052 Cost and Supply
Due to its simpler alloy composition, 3105 is generally more cost-effective than 5052.
The higher magnesium content of 5052 and its excellent performance under harsh conditions make its higher price worthwhile.
- 3105 Aluminum: Lower cost, suitable for economical scenarios with low strength requirements
- 5052 Aluminum: Higher price, but long service life (e.g., 5052 aluminum roofing can last up to 70 years, far exceeding ordinary aluminum)
In non-marine environments (e.g., construction, signage), choosing 3105 provides an economical and easy-to-form solution. When high strength, marine-grade corrosion resistance, or structural reliability is critical (e.g., ships, aerospace, automotive), 5052 is the better choice. Both alloys offer excellent weldability, but their performance differs significantly under stress and corrosive conditions.
3105 and 5052 are both non-heat-treatable wrought aluminum alloys, but the higher magnesium/chromium content in 5052 gives it greater strength, fatigue life, and resistance to marine corrosion, though its formability is slightly lower than that of 3105. Conversely, 3105 has excellent machinability, making it a cost-effective option for sheet metal applications that do not require high strength.
Products you may be interested in
- 3105 Aluminum Plate Sheet
- 3105 h14 aluminum sheet plate
- 3105 h24 aluminum sheet plate
- 3105 painted aluminum sheet
- 3105 Aluminum Coil
Users viewing this material also viewed the following
- Aluminium circle 5052 H32 for Tank Cover
- 5052 Diamond Tread Aluminum Plate
- 5052 Stucco Embossed Aluminum Sheet
- 3105 Coated Aluminum Coils
- 3105 Aluminum for Wine Bottle Caps
- 3105 Aluminum Coil for Venetian Blinds
- 3105 Aluminum for Beverage Cans
- 3105 Aluminum for Roofing Panels
- 3105 Corrugated Aluminum Sheet
- 3105 Aluminum for Lamp Holders
- 3105 Aluminum for Bottle Caps
Recommended Content